In This Issue
Subscribe
Receive your own copy of The Energy Miser
Handy Links
  Forward to a Friend
Dear Reader,

The Energy Miser #24 November 30, 2008

Yes we've been busy. That's why this newsletter is coming out in late November instead of early November. I'm sure all of you are busy with holidays so I'll keep this short.

Mark

Since I last published this newsletter, we've added a number of new email addresses. If you've been added by mistake, please click on the "Unsubscribe" link at the very beginning of this message and you will be permanently removed from the list.



Read all past issues of The Energy Miser here.

When the US House, Senate wrote the bailout bill that passed in early October they included a provision that dramatically changed the tax benefits of installing a solar electric system. They, however, did not change the tax benefits of solar hot water systems. Let's recap what those benefits are:

Starting January 1, installation of a solar electric system makes you eligible for a 30% "investment" tax credit. No it's not a deduction, it is an actual tax credit. So if you install a $20,000 solar electric system, you will realize a $6,000 (0.3 x 20,000) reduction in the income taxes you pay to the federal government. Unused credits can be carried forward to future years.

Solar hot water systems still have the 30% tax credit, however it is capped at $2,000.

Starting January 1, installation of a wind system makes you eligible for $500 per 0.5 kilowatt of rated power with a maximum of $4,000. The 1.8 kW Skystream's tax credit is worth just under $2,000. The 6kW Eoltec Scirocco's tax credit is $4,000.

There are no changes to the Massachusetts renewable energy tax credit of $1,000 (wind, solar electric, solar hot water)

You can see the specifics here.
Another Roof Put to Work
Here is a 4.1kW system we recently installed in Acton, MA. The panels are Sanyo 195-watt HIT Power modules and the inverter is a Solectria PVI-4000. This array will make about 5,000 kilowatt-hours per year.

The homeowners, Joe and Lucille, were looking to reduce their dependence on fossil fuels while helping the planet. The solar electric system will offset over 6,000 lbs of Carbon Dioxide annually. (click on the picture for a larger image)
Now, about those BTUs
A British Thermal Unit (BTU) is a unit of measure for energy. Specifically, 1 BTU will raise one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit.

The BTU (and its metric equivalent the Joule) provide us a simple way to compare heating methods. For example, burning a gallon of heating oil will generate 140,000 BTUs. Burning a cord of Oak will generate about 21,000,000 BTUs (150 gallons of oil). Running one kilowatt-hour of electricity through a space heater or electric water heater will generate about 3,400 BTUs, and a 4' x 8' solar hot water panel will collect about 30,000 BTUs on a cool sunny day.

A special note: Each method of generating heat has different efficiencies. For example, oil furnaces run at about 85% efficient. That means that of the 140,000 BTUs generated from burning a gallon of oil, 21,000 go up the chimney as waste heat with the carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide combustion byproducts. Electric heaters are nearly 100% efficient when converting electricity to heat. Gas furnaces usually run about 90% efficient.

WIth the BTU explained, let me move on to the "Amish Electric Heater."
The "Amish Electric Fireplace"
Perhaps you've seen the advertisement (cleverly disguised as normal content) in the Sunday Parade Magazine or in the Sunday comics. If you get past the oxymoronic idea of "Amish" and "Electricity", you'll see that their claims are dubious at best.

Last Sunday it was the "Amish Electric Heater." But someone must have called the company and complained that their ad was misleading because the heater was not Amish, just the cabinet was.

This week it's the "Amish Mantle and miracle invention." The mantle may be Amish in style but the electric heater should only be a miracle to someone who lived more than a hundred years ago. Electric heaters have been around a long time.

The ad claims that their heater will "help home heat bills hit rock bottom." But keep reading and you'll see how. You have to turn down your thermostat - duh. The only difference is that if you put one of their "miracle" devices in the room you spend your time in, you won't notice that your furnace or boiler is not heating the room.

If you read their claims (aren't you glad I'm doing this so you won't have to :-), on "standard" setting, their "miracle" device uses 8 cents per hour in electricity. At typical Massachusetts rates (about 16 cents per kWh), that means that the device is using about 500 watts of power on its "standard" setting. (500 watts X 1 hour X 16 cents per kWh = 8 cents.

That 8 cents of electricity (0.5 kWh) through a 100% efficient electric heater will generate about 1,700 BTUs of heat energy. If you read further into their ad, you see that the heater can generate an "amazing 5,119 BTUs on high setting." In other words, their "miracle" device, on its "high" setting is a 1,500 watt heater. How do I know? The math is pretty simple. If a 500 watt heater generates 1,700 BTUs, how large a heater do I need to generate 5119 BTUs? 5,119 is almost exactly (another oxymoron) 3 times 1,700. Thus, 3 X 500 watts = 1,500 watts.

A quick scan of Amazon.com and I found a number of 1,500 watt electric heaters. The most expensive was approximately $60. The least expensive was $21. The "Amish" heater is $249. No wonder in this week's ad, they are "giving" you two free heaters if you buy one. I'm betting that with their "Amish" cabinets, you are probably getting $100 of "stuff" for $249 (plus shipping). What a bargain.

If you've already bought one, sorry. Try and get your money back. Worst case, you'll have lost your shipping costs. If you have not bought one yet and are thinking about it, save your money and get a "non miracle" 1,500-watt electric heater for under $30.

And as always, be skeptical.
BTU Footnote
Here is a little comparison of the cost per BTU from various sources of energy. To make the numbers reasonable, I'll use 100,000 useful BTUs. That means that I'll apply the efficiencies. Without the 100,000 multiplier, the results are tiny and hard to compare. (By the way, 100,000 BTUs = 1 Therm)

Assumptions:

Cost of Fuel:
Electricity: $0.16 per kWh
Home heating oil: $3.10 per gallon
Natural gas: $1.40 per Therm.

Efficiency:
Electricity: 99%,
Oil: 85%
Gas: 90%

Electricity: $4.66 per 100,000 useful BTUs
Oil: $2.65 per 100,000 useful BTUs
Natural Gas: $1.55 per 100,000 useful BTUs

Yes, electricity is the most expensive source of heat BTUs when compared to Oil and Gas. Another reason to be skeptical of the "Amish Electric Heater." Only heat with electricity when the other options are not practical.
Solar Powered Calculators Etc.
My son Russell is collecting the solar collectors from dead calculators and other non-functioning solar powered devices. If you have any, let me know and we'll arrange pickup. And he promises (and I'll hold him to it) that the parts he does not use will be recycled properly.

Turn down your thermostat, disable your doorbell, reduce waste, use a fan instead of an air conditioner, turn off the lights, switch to compact fluorescent bulbs, put computer gear on a power strip and turn it off at night, unplug unnecessary appliances, ventilate your attic, take shorter showers, walk instead of drive, ride a bike, group your errands, inflate your tires, grow your own food, eat locally-produced food, recycle, use your most efficient vehicle, get a hybrid vehicle, wash your clothes in cold water, buy less packaging, use a clothesline instead of the dryer, drink tap water, print with narrower margins, use both sides of the page, buy less, compost, install a renewable energy system...

Thanks for Reading the Energy Miser,


Mark Durrenberger
New England Breeze, LLC

phone: 978-567-WIND (9463)
web: http://www.newenglandbreeze.com